Sunday, July 19, 2020
Top 25 Safest Cities in America 2020
1. Naperville (Illinois) - Steve Chirico (R) - W
2. Irvine (California) - Christina L. Shea (R) - W
3. Thousand Oaks (California) - Al Adam (Neutral) - W
4. Provo (Utah) - Michelle Kaufusi (R) - W
5. Round Rock (Texas) - Craig Morgan (R) - W
6. Carlsbad (California) - Matt Hall (R) - W
7. Sunnyvale (California) - Larry Klein (Neutral) - W
8. Glendale (California) - Vrej Agajanian (Neutral) - W
9. Plano (Texas) - Harry LaRosiliere (D) - B
10. Overland Park (Kansas) - Carl R. Gerlach (R) - W
11. Port St. Lucie (Florida) - Greg Oravec (Neutral) - W
12. Rochester (Minnesota) - Kim Norto (I) - W
13. Burbank (California) - Sharon Springer (D) - W
14. Ann Arbor (Michigan) - Christopher Taylor (D) - W
15. Temecula (California) - Maryann Edwards (Neutral) - W
16. Bellevue (Washington) - Lynne Robinson (Neutral) - W
17. Cape Coral (Florida) - Joe Coviello (Neutral) - W
18. Roseville (California) - John Allard (Neutral) - W
19. Santa Clara (California) - Lisa Gillmor (Neutral) - W
20. McAllen (Texas) - Jim Darling (Neutral) - W
21. Richardson (Texas) - Paul Voelker (Neutral) - W
22. Boulder (Colorado) - Sam Weaver (D) - W
23. Corona (California) - Jim Steiner (Neutral) - W
24. Torrance (California) - Patrick J. Furey (Neutral) - W
25. Orange (California) - Mark A. Murphy (Neutral) - W
.
25 Most Dangerous Cities In The US In 2020
1. Detroit, Michigan - Mike Duggan - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 2,007
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,304
2. Memphis, Tennessee - Jim Strickland - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,943
Property Crimes Per 100k: 6,405
3. Birmingham, Alabama - Randall Woodfin - Black - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,911
Property Crimes Per 100k: 6,313
4. Baltimore, Maryland - Jack Young - Black - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,833
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,495
5. St. Louis, Missouri - Lyda Krewson - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,800
Property Crimes Per 100k: 5,911
6. Kansas City, Missouri - Quinton Lucas - Black - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,590
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,306
7. Cleveland, Ohio - Frank G. Jackson - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,449
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,411
8. Little Rock, Arkansas - Frank Scott Jr. - Black - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,446
Property Crimes Per 100k: 6,547
9. Milwaukee, Wisconsin - Tom Barrett - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,413
Property Crimes Per 100k: 2,971
10. Stockton, California - Michael Tubbs - Black - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,399
Property Crimes Per 100k: 3,768
11. Rockford, Illinois - Tom McNamara - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,386
Property Crimes Per 100k: 3,671
12. Albuquerque, New Mexico - Tim Keller - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,364
Property Crimes Per 100k: 6,179
13. San Bernardino, California - John Valdivia - Hispanic - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,333
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,135
14. Springfield, Missouri - Ken McClure - White - Independent
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,316
Property Crimes Per 100k: 7,019
15. Anchorage, Alaska - Ethan Berkowitz - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,309
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,927
16. Oakland, California - Libby Schaaf - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,273
Property Crimes Per 100k: 5,390
17. Indianapolis, Indiana - Joe Hogsett - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,272
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,129
18. Wichita, Kansas - Brandon Whipple - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,179
Property Crimes Per 100k: 5,618
19. New Orleans, Louisiana - LaToya Cantrell - Black - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,163
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,557
20. Nashville, Tennessee - John Cooper - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,113
Property Crimes Per 100k: 4,011
21. Lansing, Michigan - Andy Schor - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,108
Property Crimes Per 100k: 3,030
22. Hartford, Connecticut - Luke Bronin - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,066
Property Crimes Per 100k: 3,602
23. Tulsa, Oklahoma - G. T. Bynum - White - Republican
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,065
Property Crimes Per 100k: 5,430
24. Beaumont, Texas - Becky Ames - White - Republican
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,059
Property Crimes Per 100k: 3,783
25. Chattanooga, Tennessee - Andy Berke - White - Democrat
Violent Crimes Per 100k: 1,048
Property Crimes Per 100k: 6,058
Source: Wikipedia 7-19-20 BB
Friday, July 10, 2020
BLM Gives No Credit
| BLM accomplished nothing because of anarchy ruling instead. |
If I were marketing a product of any
sort, I would keep my political views to myself. Why are business
owners, athletes, and movie stars so quick to throw themselves on a
potentially damaging controversial sword? It rarely helps their business
and often alienates customers. Look at the NFL for a prime example. On
top of that, Black Lives Matter will give ZERO credit and zero positive
acknowledgement.
To
most voters watching the news, BLM has become a twisted perverted
movement that has done more damage to boost the black cause than can be
repaired. The many videos of massive looting, killing and injuring cops,
business owners, and bystanders portrays the very opposite message of
acceptance for their cause, civility and racial harmony.Worse of all, it
makes people more distrusting, further hurting the BLM cause.
In
this regard, BLM is a miserable failure and paints the exact opposite
picture of what was surely intended. The rabid anarchical displays from
across the country portray lawlessness, contempt for authority, and
greed - nothing more.
Our
world here in Baytown with our multi-ethnical cohesion makes all of
this destructive behavior appear to be from another country and does not
reflect life here in our town. I quit watching or listening to the
talking heads, because the world they describe is far away. I suggest
everyone do the same and let's get on with life.
.
.
Thursday, June 18, 2020
Go away Aunt Jemima!
BB's take: There's only one thing worse, in the universe and that's no Aunt Jemima at all! Yup, they finally pulled the old gal down to the ground and beat her senseless. Danged white people! Oh wait! What? It wasn't white people? Then why? Everyone loves Aunt Jemima. She has fed us and our kids all our lives.
Oh well, she needed to go. I get it. We need to totally erase history so we can relive it! Genius!
.
.
Skunks and race-baiting.
BB's
take: Remember the old saying, "A skunk always smells its own hole
first"? Without stressing the obvious meaning, if a person is always
seeing bad in everything around them, there is a good chance most of it
is emanating from inside their own head. Take the race-baiters as an
example. They see racism all around them because they are basically
guilty of racism.
The rest of us see 'people', some of whom have different cultures or social differences. Some we associate with because they emulate our own culture. Some we don't for the opposite reason. it is as simple as that unless you add the criminal element on any level; then all rules are different.
The rest of us see 'people', some of whom have different cultures or social differences. Some we associate with because they emulate our own culture. Some we don't for the opposite reason. it is as simple as that unless you add the criminal element on any level; then all rules are different.
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Is it time to overturn the wagon?
I love to geocache. I fell in love with the idea of “treasure hunting” from my dad who loved to read Argosy Magazines in the 1960’s. They were full of adventure and pirate loot stories. He regularly had the Herter’s catalog delivered and I studied the hand-made fishing lures and the possibility of going into the wild just made the pictures that much more exciting.
In November of 2003 I was introduced to the “new” game of Geocaching by Sam Morrow (USMorrows). Sam was the superintendent of the Lab at the Chemical Plant we both worked for and we both recognized each other as computer nerds, something that was fairly odd at the time. In a Plant with 225 people, there were only a few of us that fit this distinction and Sam introduced me to the game. Sam was also one of the 5 original authors of the Texas Geocaching Association that is still active 18 years later. I served on the board for 2.5 years as the SETX Rep. HKK8W1
I want to build a little history here so folks who read my proposal won’t think I’m nuts or are attempting to pervert the game somehow. I will propose some changes Groundspeak could implement and another idea for those of us that actually hide and maintain our caches and I say this with kindness and much deliberation. I’m not particularly happy about the evolution of the game and feel some changes and restrictions would benefit those who play and improve the quality of the game.
Over the last 10 years I’ve either hosted an event, workshop, geocaching 101 class, or hid geocaches to the tune of over 650 caches/events. I’ve released possibly a hundred trackables also. A few months ago I archived the bulk of my caches, leaving only 42 active caches. I went from over 300 active to less than 50 - and NO one noticed. The reason is the huge majority of cachers had already found them. The second reason I believe is few were under a light pole skirt or easy to grab by newbies.
The advent of the Smartphone has caused this directly. Am I bashing technology? Nope, but it is what it is. Little invested, little returned and with a rash of newbies hiding low quality caches and then abandoning them has become almost a geocaching contagion. I cheered our reviewer (Vertighost) when I read a note on a cache they archived and it sated that because of abandonment and no maintenance, the ache was ineligible to be unarchived. Hoorah! Finally some sense.
Back in the day, it was the same message as the Bible in that we needed to populate the earth (with geocaches this time) and anyone could and still can publish a cache without finding one or becoming a premium member. What I am proposing is Groundspeak create a rule that only premium members can hide caches. We no longer need to seed the earth with caches. For the longest time I have advocated hiding a cache only after finding their first 50. I have suggested this many times in geocaching 101 classes and at events. Although most will deny it, but we as a whole have become number greedy to the point that if we don’t find about 30 in a few hours, we feel like we didn’t do so well. This is why many of us do not cache alone. I well remember the excitement of the old days when finding ONE was exciting and yes, being an alpha and not really too concerned, I cached alone. Trust me when I say this cuts way down on your finds and the amount of time at each cache.
I still cache alone for the most part and the old magic is still active.
Proof of number-running is in the multi’s and actual difficult T/D logs. They are dismal when these should be awesome challenges to cachers. Cachers for the most part pass them by (in my own cache experience) in favor of gaining more numbers. Geocaching has either become a social event or a power trail run and this is due to the mass spreading of weak low T/D rated caches.
As I’ve stated in the past, I think the geotours and the Adventure Labs have been ruinous to local geocachers who have many hides. Local cachers have found all my caches and new cachers walk past my caches to go directly to a GT or AL cache, log it, and then walk right past my cache and leave. This is why I archived so many of my caches (I actually check on them and maintain). I also shut down my Adventure Lab series. I am putting my money where my mouth is.
I wanted to see the impact archiving would have and it had - none. The good thing was I began hiding some new ones and sure enough, the veteran cachers responded.
So, my proposal is those of us that see the need to add new life into the game, archive many of our caches. It used to be a big deal to find a cache that was 10 years old. Now? Not so much, so archive them and open the area for new caches/cachers. Wait a few months and if no one takes up the calling, begin adding new improved and better caches. You will be rewarded. http://ourbaytown.com/baytownbert/geocache.htm
In November of 2003 I was introduced to the “new” game of Geocaching by Sam Morrow (USMorrows). Sam was the superintendent of the Lab at the Chemical Plant we both worked for and we both recognized each other as computer nerds, something that was fairly odd at the time. In a Plant with 225 people, there were only a few of us that fit this distinction and Sam introduced me to the game. Sam was also one of the 5 original authors of the Texas Geocaching Association that is still active 18 years later. I served on the board for 2.5 years as the SETX Rep. HKK8W1
I want to build a little history here so folks who read my proposal won’t think I’m nuts or are attempting to pervert the game somehow. I will propose some changes Groundspeak could implement and another idea for those of us that actually hide and maintain our caches and I say this with kindness and much deliberation. I’m not particularly happy about the evolution of the game and feel some changes and restrictions would benefit those who play and improve the quality of the game.
Over the last 10 years I’ve either hosted an event, workshop, geocaching 101 class, or hid geocaches to the tune of over 650 caches/events. I’ve released possibly a hundred trackables also. A few months ago I archived the bulk of my caches, leaving only 42 active caches. I went from over 300 active to less than 50 - and NO one noticed. The reason is the huge majority of cachers had already found them. The second reason I believe is few were under a light pole skirt or easy to grab by newbies.
The advent of the Smartphone has caused this directly. Am I bashing technology? Nope, but it is what it is. Little invested, little returned and with a rash of newbies hiding low quality caches and then abandoning them has become almost a geocaching contagion. I cheered our reviewer (Vertighost) when I read a note on a cache they archived and it sated that because of abandonment and no maintenance, the ache was ineligible to be unarchived. Hoorah! Finally some sense.
Back in the day, it was the same message as the Bible in that we needed to populate the earth (with geocaches this time) and anyone could and still can publish a cache without finding one or becoming a premium member. What I am proposing is Groundspeak create a rule that only premium members can hide caches. We no longer need to seed the earth with caches. For the longest time I have advocated hiding a cache only after finding their first 50. I have suggested this many times in geocaching 101 classes and at events. Although most will deny it, but we as a whole have become number greedy to the point that if we don’t find about 30 in a few hours, we feel like we didn’t do so well. This is why many of us do not cache alone. I well remember the excitement of the old days when finding ONE was exciting and yes, being an alpha and not really too concerned, I cached alone. Trust me when I say this cuts way down on your finds and the amount of time at each cache.
I still cache alone for the most part and the old magic is still active.
Proof of number-running is in the multi’s and actual difficult T/D logs. They are dismal when these should be awesome challenges to cachers. Cachers for the most part pass them by (in my own cache experience) in favor of gaining more numbers. Geocaching has either become a social event or a power trail run and this is due to the mass spreading of weak low T/D rated caches.
As I’ve stated in the past, I think the geotours and the Adventure Labs have been ruinous to local geocachers who have many hides. Local cachers have found all my caches and new cachers walk past my caches to go directly to a GT or AL cache, log it, and then walk right past my cache and leave. This is why I archived so many of my caches (I actually check on them and maintain). I also shut down my Adventure Lab series. I am putting my money where my mouth is.
I wanted to see the impact archiving would have and it had - none. The good thing was I began hiding some new ones and sure enough, the veteran cachers responded.
So, my proposal is those of us that see the need to add new life into the game, archive many of our caches. It used to be a big deal to find a cache that was 10 years old. Now? Not so much, so archive them and open the area for new caches/cachers. Wait a few months and if no one takes up the calling, begin adding new improved and better caches. You will be rewarded. http://ourbaytown.com/baytownbert/geocache.htm
Thursday, April 02, 2020
The Failing Democratic Party
BB's take: I would be embarrassed to tell anyone I voted for Joe Biden. I'm embarrassed he is an American politician. I'm embarrassed to think any logically-minded voter would embrace the failing Democratic platform. I haven't seen evidence of reasoning or logic by anyone trying to defend the Democratic vision. Their whole plan is one of tearing down the Republican party and the Trump administration in particular while ignoring the needs of the American people. They have to tear down everything Trump has accomplished in order to regain their grip on the necks of their voters. The truth is the Democratic Party is finished. Pelosi is desperate and has lost control of her party. Its obvious to all who have open eyes, not clouded by socialist propaganda.
.
Wednesday, April 01, 2020
Not all businesses are welcome here
I was walking in Jenkins Park the other day near the dog park, when in rolled a beautiful Ford F-350 pulling what looked like a small animal trailer. It was obviously expensively modified with big black chrome bumpers and enough LED lighting to make it visible from the orbiting international space station. One of the next things I noticed was the bright orange California license plates and the graphic design of a oddly marked Pitt Bull Terrier on the driver’s door.
My first thought was Hollywood had arrived to shoot an episode of Pit Bulls & Parolees, but the tall Marlboro man-looking character who got out wasn’t wearing the usual garb of the show. On the contrary he looked like a... movie star and very rich. The woman who walked out of the passenger compartment was his match in female form. Both were elaborately tattooed all the way up to their chin.
They began to set up a small tent and station right in front of the dog park and I was curious, as were about a dozen disc golf folks and they didn’t keep us in suspense long. My jaw dropped when I found out they had literature and plans to open a shop on Texas Avenue to tattoo... animals! Yes, that’s right. Tattoo animals, birds, reptiles, and even fish. They claimed they had filed to open the business and it appeared it would go through by mid-April or earlier.
The trailer wasn’t an animal carrier; it was a rolling tattoo parlor and the exotic woman, who remained mute handed each of us 8X10 glossy photos of their work. The one she handed me was of a 14 pound Shih-Tzu minus its coat and mostly covered with what only could be described as a body sleeve of Celtic runes. On its back right above its tail was the usual scroll of odd designs so many woman sport. I was so astounded I couldn’t speak and she took my silence as one of open admiration of their work. The disc golfers thought it was “cool” and “awesome” as we passed the photos among us. One was a boa constrictor tatted to resemble a barber’s pole. It had what I would describe as sad eyes.
Another was a shaved cat that was checkered red and black like a board game, but the most bizarre was a featherless cockatiel covered in what looked like little pictures of Bernie’s face. “I don’t know y’all...” is all I could muster and I left the park, fully intending to call my council person and literally beg them to not give this business the go ahead. I’m not sure if they were breaking some law or not. I just knew I felt it was horribly inhumane.
That was a week ago and I haven’t made that call remembering the warm reception the golf guys gave them. Anyway, I think they will be opening a shop soon and I refuse to treat my doggies to this painful procedure no matter how “cool” and “awesome” some believe it to be. Maybe I’ll make that call after all.
.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
🇺🇲 BB's Uncensored Daily News Brief #615 11-01-26 #Alt-news
🇺🇲 BB's Uncensored Daily News Brief #615 11-01-26 #Alt -news 🇺🇲 Use a search engine to investigate each headline via SOURCE cited...
-
San Jacinto Memorial Hospital stands on a hill on Decker Drive and looks like a place the Munsters would inhabit. Here is the sad dem...
-
The painted and tether horse close to Wal-Mart Am I the only one who has spied the painted horse standing by a tree on W. Cedar B...
-
I pride myself on making as few mistakes as possible and when I do err, it is usually due to omission, rather than commission. In eas...


